Is this an “abstract” photograph? A lot of photographers use this term loosely enough that they end up designating many straight photographs as “abstract”. I define as abstract only those photographs which challenge me to the point that I cannot identify the object(s) photographed. When subjects are not completely representational but easy to identify (like my photograph of this Mojave Yucca), I term them “extracts” (I “extracted” only this portion of the Yucca from the more representational full view of the plant).
What do you call it?
You are visiting the blog of fine art photographer Michael E. Gordon. For additional photos and information, please visit his official website.

“Extracts,” that’s an interesting term. I’d personally just call it beautiful! It has a bit of sea urchininess with tendrils going on. Those white tendrils are a great contrast.
-scott c
Hi Scott: THANKS for looking and commenting – I appreciate it!
I would call it abstract, for the same reason you do. I don’t see a Yucca plant when I see this image. I see beautiful swirling shapes and lines. Nice abstract, Michael.
- Dan .
Thanks for your comment, Dan!
Michael,
I would call it abstract as well. I don’t see the yucca and would have wondered what it was if you had not told us.
Thanks for your comment, Youssef. I apparently know these plants too well, because it only looks like a Yucca to me!
I’m with Scott – I would just say it’s beautiful.
Thank you, Laurent!